Development:Debugging Crash

Getting Started

• Debug an application with `gdb --args FEXInterpreter <application full path>`
• Under GDB make sure to do `handle SIGBUS SIGILL SIG63 noprint`
  • We use signals for various things, check out Here for more information

Crash in emulated/JIT code

Walking through debugging a simple test application that is crashing.

 $ gdb --args FEXInterpreter ./sigsegv_test
 Reading symbols from FEXInterpreter...
 (gdb) r
 Starting program: /usr/bin/FEXInterpreter ./sigsegv_test
 [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
 Using host libthread_db library "/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
 [New Thread 0x7fccb75f30 (LWP 90107)]
 
 Thread 2 "FEXInterpreter" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
 [Switching to Thread 0x7fccb75f30 (LWP 90107)]
 0x0000007fccfb9ec8 in ?? ()

• Okay, we have a sigsegv. Let's double check that it is JIT code (aka, guest emulated code)

 (gdb) disas $pc,+32
 Dump of assembler code from 0x7fe26ebc20 to 0x7fe26ebc40:
 => 0x0000007fe26ebc20:  stlrb   w22, [x21]
    0x0000007fe26ebc24:  mov     x4, #0x0                        // #0
    0x0000007fe26ebc28:  ldr     x10, [x20]
    0x0000007fe26ebc2c:  add     x21, x20, #0x8
    0x0000007fe26ebc30:  mov     x22, #0x0                       // #0
    0x0000007fe26ebc34:  strb    w22, [x28, #428]
    0x0000007fe26ebc38:  mov     x22, #0x0                       // #0
    0x0000007fe26ebc3c:  strb    w22, [x28, #431]
 End of assembler dump.
 (gdb) info reg x9
 x9             0x0                 0

• Looks like JIT code, even doing accesses to x28 which is the FEX CPU state
• Code has no backtrace which reinforces this
• Code is doing an atomic store, which reinforces this is FEX emulating the x86 TSO memory model

• Now that we have checked that we are in the JIT code. Where are we in the guest side?
• Let's dump the FEX CPU state information that is directly pointed to in x28 at all times in JIT code.

 (gdb) p/x ((FEXCore::Core::CpuStateFrame*)$x28)->State
 $3 = {rip = 0x401110, gregs = {0x416eb0, 0x7fe1e3b640, 0xffffffffffffff70, 0x0, 0x7fe1e3bf30, 0x0, 0x416eb0, 0x7fe1e3ae28, 0x0, 0x7fe1e3b640, 0x8, 0x7fe2054cc0, 0x7ff75ff48e, 0x7ff75ff48f, 0x0, 0x7fe163b000}, xmm = {{0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0}, {0xdeadbeef, 0xbad0dad1} <repeats 14 times>}, es = 0x0, cs = 0x0, ss = 0x0, ds = 0x0, gs = 0x0, fs = 0x7fe1e3b640, flags = {0x0, 0x1, 0x0,
   0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x1, 0x0 <repeats 38 times>}, mm = {{0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0}, {0x0, 0x0}}, gdt = {{base = 0x0} <repeats 32 times>}, FCW = 0x37f, FTW = 0xffff}

• Looks like our guest RIP is currently `0x401110`
  • Consult the `info proc mappings` again

 0x401000           0x402000     0x1000     0x1000 {...}/sigsegv_test

• Yep, we are inside our test application
• For a simple test, let's load the application in gdb-multiarch and disassemble where we are

 $ gdb-multiarch ./sigsegv_test
 Reading symbols from ./sigsegv_test...
 (gdb) set disassembly-flavor intel
 (gdb) disas 0x401110
 Dump of assembler code for function main(int, char**):
    0x0000000000401110 <+0>:     push   rbp
    0x0000000000401111 <+1>:     mov    rbp,rsp
    0x0000000000401114 <+4>:     mov    DWORD PTR [rbp-0x4],0x0
    0x000000000040111b <+11>:    mov    DWORD PTR [rbp-0x8],edi
    0x000000000040111e <+14>:    mov    QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10],rsi
    0x0000000000401122 <+18>:    mov    rax,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x10]
    0x0000000000401126 <+22>:    movsxd rcx,DWORD PTR [rbp-0x8]
    0x000000000040112a <+26>:    mov    rax,QWORD PTR [rax+rcx*8]
    0x000000000040112e <+30>:    mov    QWORD PTR [rbp-0x18],rax
    0x0000000000401132 <+34>:    mov    rax,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x18]
    0x0000000000401136 <+38>:    mov    BYTE PTR [rax],0x63
    0x0000000000401139 <+41>:    xor    eax,eax
    0x000000000040113b <+43>:    pop    rbp
    0x000000000040113c <+44>:    ret
 End of assembler dump.
 (gdb)

• Okay, not super helpful since FEX translates instructions in to blocks, `0x401110` is just our starting address
  • It's in this code somewhere, let's change some FEX settings to get a clearer picture
• Set block size to one instruction and disable multiblock

• Now rerun our test application and find the new RIP

 (gdb) p/x ((FEXCore::Core::CpuStateFrame*)$x28)->State.rip
 $2 = 0x401136

• Alright, now we know the RIP is exactly at `0x401136`
• Back in gdb-multiarch

 (gdb) disas 0x401136,+1
 Dump of assembler code from 0x401136 to 0x401137:
    0x0000000000401136 <main(int, char**)+38>:   mov    BYTE PTR [rax],0x63

• Looks like something in main is storing 0x63 to a nullptr
• In this simple case we can now take a look at the test application's source and find the problem.
  • We know the problem is in the first block of main()
  • We know the exact instruction that it is at
  • We know it's something storing a byte to memory
• For more complex cases it is likely necessary to use reverse engineering tools
  • BinaryNinja, Ghidra, IDA, and Hopper are all examples of tools like this

What to do from here

Now it becomes a lot harder. You don't get a typical debugging environment or even clean backtraces.

FEX's gdbserver integration is sorely lacking so you can't even use a remote gdb server connecting to FEX right now.

If you enable thunks you can get better backtraces here. Debugging_Crash_In_Thunks

Double checking if we are in JIT code

 (gdb) info reg pc
 pc             0x7fccfb9ec8        0x7fccfb9ec8
 
 (gdb) info proc mappings
 ...
 0x7fccfb9000       0x7fcdfb9000  0x1000000        0x0

• Looks like FEX JIT mapping, we start out at 16MB but scale up to 128MB
• Depending on version of FEX we can check the base mapping for a unique string

 (gdb) p (char*)0x7fccfb9000
 $4 = 0x7fccfb9000 "FEXJIT::Arm64JITCore::"